Supreme Court Gives States Wide Authority To Collect Taxes On Remote Sales

From Forbes.com

The U.S. Supreme Court has given states broad authority to require online and other remote sellers to collect sales taxes. And it has largely ended decades of uncertainty over the ability to states to collect taxes on online sales.

The 5-4 decision, in the case of South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc.,  explicitly reverses prior Court precedents that barred states from requiring retailers to collect tax unless the firms had a physical presence, such as a store or warehouse, in their jurisdiction.

The Court decided the most recent of those cases, Quill Corp. v North Dakota, in 1992. In that decision, the justices urged Congress to establish rules of the road for taxing remote sales. In the 26 years since, lawmakers have been unable to act. However, as online selling grew, states began finding their own ways to work around the Quill decision.

Now dozens do collect from remote sellers, sometimes stretching the law to argue that an online retailer establishes a physical presence in a state merely by leaving a cookie on a resident’s computer. The Tax Foundation estimates that 31 states already require non-resident remote sellers to collect tax.

Many sellers are already collecting

At the same time, many large online sellers have begun collecting tax from all customers who live in states that impose sales taxes, choosing a single model rather than collecting for buyers in some states and not in others. But there are exceptions. Amazon, for instance, collects on all its direct sales but not on behalf of third party sellers.

As a result, the practical effect of the Wayfair ruling will be modest for many consumers. And despite claims of some online sales tax critics, any additional revenues will result from states collecting a tax that most consumers already owe. That’s because states currently impose a “use tax” that requires consumers to pay tax directly if it is not collected by sellers. Few consumers comply and few states try to enforce the tax, but residents owe the money nonetheless.

How much tax revenue is being lost? That’s a matter of debate, but some estimates are as high as 

Continue Reading Here